Menu
👩‍💻Dev.to #systemdesign·February 25, 2026

Dependency Injection for Scalable and Maintainable Systems

This article explores Dependency Injection (DI) as a crucial technique for building scalable and maintainable large-scale applications, directly addressing the Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP). It highlights how proper DI goes beyond object creation, significantly impacting performance through careful lifecycle management and reducing memory pressure from excessive object instantiations. Understanding DI is key for designing modular and testable software architectures.

Read original on Dev.to #systemdesign

The Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)

The article begins by establishing that Dependency Injection is a technique to achieve the Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP), one of the SOLID principles. DIP states that high-level modules should not depend on low-level modules; both should depend on abstractions. This means designing systems where source code dependencies refer to interfaces or abstract classes rather than concrete implementations, promoting flexibility and decoupling within the architecture.

csharp
public class EmailSender { /* concrete implementation */ }
public class OrderService
{
    private readonly EmailSender _emailSender = new EmailSender(); // concrete dependency
    public void PlaceOrder(string customerEmail) { /* ... */ _emailSender.Send(customerEmail, "Your order has been placed."); }
}
ℹ️

Impact of Violating DIP

Violating DIP leads to rigid systems where changes in low-level modules can propagate to high-level modules, making the system harder to maintain and extend. This tight coupling hinders modularity and testability.

Dependency Injection as a Solution

Dependency Injection is presented as the practical method to apply DIP. Instead of high-level modules instantiating their dependencies (creating concrete dependencies), dependencies are provided (injected) from an external source. This typically involves passing interfaces or abstract types through constructors or setters, allowing the concrete implementation to be swapped out without altering the high-level module's code.

csharp
public interface INotifier { void Notify(string to, string message); }
public class EmailNotifier : INotifier { /* concrete implementation */ }
public class OrderService
{
    private readonly INotifier _notifier;
    public OrderService(INotifier notifier) // injected abstraction
    { _notifier = notifier; }
    public void PlaceOrder(string customerEmail) { /* ... */ _notifier.Notify(customerEmail, "Your order has been placed."); }
}

Performance and Maintainability Implications

The article emphasizes that DI's benefits extend beyond managing object graphs to directly impacting application performance and maintainability. Excessive manual object creation (using `new` keyword everywhere) can lead to significant memory pressure due to repeated allocations, impacting garbage collection and overall runtime performance. DI containers, by managing object lifecycles (Singleton, Scoped, Transient), help optimize resource usage and reduce object creation overhead.

  • Singleton: Created once for the application's lifetime (e.g., logging, configuration, caching).
  • Scoped: Created once per specific scope (e.g., per HTTP request in web applications, like a DbContext).
  • Transient: A new instance is created every time it's requested (e.g., lightweight utility services).
Dependency InjectionDIPSOLID PrinciplesSoftware ArchitectureModularityTestabilityObject LifecyclesPerformance Optimization

Comments

Loading comments...