Menu
๐ŸถDatadog BlogยทNovember 12, 2024

Scaling Kubernetes Pods with Watermark Pod Autoscaler for Cost Management

This article discusses the challenges of scaling Kubernetes pods and introduces the Watermark Pod Autoscaler (WPA) as an alternative to the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA). It highlights how WPA, by incorporating 'watermarks' for scaling triggers, can lead to more predictable and cost-effective resource provisioning, especially in environments with fluctuating workloads, making it a key tool for optimizing Kubernetes infrastructure.

Read original on Datadog Blog

Understanding Kubernetes Autoscaling Challenges

Traditional Kubernetes autoscalers, like the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA), primarily react to metrics such as CPU or memory utilization to scale pods up or down. While effective for general scaling, this reactive approach can sometimes lead to 'thrashing' (frequent scaling events) or cost inefficiencies due to over-provisioning during low-demand periods, or slow reaction to spikes. Designing a robust autoscaling strategy is critical for performance and cost control in dynamic microservice architectures.

Introducing the Watermark Pod Autoscaler (WPA)

The Watermark Pod Autoscaler (WPA) offers a more nuanced approach by introducing 'low' and 'high' watermarks for metrics. Instead of scaling based on a single threshold, WPA uses these ranges to determine when to scale up or down. This mechanism provides a buffer, reducing unnecessary scaling events and allowing for more stable resource allocation. This is particularly beneficial for applications with predictable spikes or troughs, enabling a more proactive scaling strategy.

๐Ÿ’ก

WPA vs. HPA Comparison

While HPA scales based on target average utilization, WPA uses 'low' and 'high' thresholds, acting as buffers. For instance, WPA might scale up when CPU hits 80% (high watermark) and scale down when it drops below 40% (low watermark), preventing rapid, small-scale adjustments that can be costly and destabilizing. HPA's simpler threshold can lead to more frequent oscillations around the target.

Architectural Benefits for Cost Optimization

From a system design perspective, WPA's configurable watermarks allow architects to fine-tune scaling behavior to align with application-specific requirements and cost targets. By preventing rapid scale-down (due to a low watermark) and ensuring adequate buffer before scaling up (due to a high watermark), WPA helps in: 1) Reducing cloud infrastructure costs by minimizing over-provisioning, 2) Improving application stability by preventing rapid oscillations in pod counts, and 3) Providing more predictable performance by maintaining a suitable number of ready pods.

  • Configurability: Define distinct low and high watermarks for better control.
  • Stability: Reduces 'thrashing' and unnecessary scaling operations.
  • Cost-efficiency: Optimizes resource utilization by avoiding rapid over-provisioning or under-provisioning.
  • Predictability: More stable pod counts lead to more predictable application performance.
yaml
apiVersion: datadoghq.com/v1alpha1
kind: WatermarkPodAutoscaler
metadata:
  name: my-app-wpa
spec:
  scaleTargetRef:
    apiVersion: apps/v1
    kind: Deployment
    name: my-app
  minReplicas: 2
  maxReplicas: 10
  metrics:
  - type: Resource
    resource:
      name: cpu
      high: 80
      low: 40
KubernetesAutoscalingWPAHPACost OptimizationCloud NativeContainer OrchestrationResource Management

Comments

Loading comments...